Top 10 Medicare Advantage Insurers by Number of Five-Star Plans

PlainMedicare ranks insurance organizations by the number of CMS five-star-rated Medicare Advantage plans they offer, using the organizations aggregate. Updates automatically as our source data refreshes.

Research period:

Compiled by Plainmedicare Editorial on 2026-05-15

Research question

Among the parent insurance organizations that offer Medicare Advantage plans nationwide, which carriers have accumulated the largest number of plans rated five stars on the CMS Star Ratings program, and how does five-star concentration scale with total plan portfolio size and geographic footprint?

Methodology

This ranking is generated automatically from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services's published dataset and reflects the most recently reported figures for each entity. The page updates whenever we refresh our copy of the source data, so the numbers always match the latest release we have ingested.

Coverage and exclusions: entities with no reported value for this metric are left out of the ranking rather than shown as zero, since a missing figure is not the same as an actual zero. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services occasionally withholds a value for confidentiality, small-sample, or quality-control reasons, and those withheld entries are excluded the same way.

Data provenance: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes this dataset on its own release schedule, and we pull each new release as it becomes publicly available. If a later release revises a prior figure, the revised number will appear here automatically the next time we refresh our copy, no part of this page is hand-edited.

Editorial governance: PlainMedicare maintains an editorial standards process covering how rankings are built, how outliers are handled, and how corrections are processed if an entity disputes a figure attributed to it. A named editor reviews this page before publication, shown in the byline above. Corrections and clarifications can be requested through the contact channels linked in the site footer.

Transparency: every number on this page traces back to a specific Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services source record, linked from the entity pages reachable from this ranking. See our methodology page for the full source list, update cadence, and how each figure is derived.

See the methodology page for the complete ETL pipeline, source vintage, and column lineage.

Top 10 Medicare Advantage Insurers by Number of Five-Star Plans

Live data, updated automatically whenever we refresh our copy of the source

1. Medicare y Mucho Mas (MMM)34,3342. Independent Health6,3753. MCS Classicare2,5764. Devoted Health7805. UnitedHealthcare5896. Georgia Health Advantage2607. Alignment Health Plan1788. NHC Advantage1789. Texas Independence Health Plan17810. Longevity Health Plan46

The ranked top 10

Every row below reflects the most recent data we have on file. Refresh the page after we update our copy of the source to see the latest values.

# Organization Five-star plans Total plans Avg star rating Enrollment
1 Medicare y Mucho Mas (MMM) 34,334 45 5 0
2 Independent Health 6,375 13 4.7 0
3 MCS Classicare 2,576 35 5 0
4 Devoted Health 780 88 4.09 0
5 UnitedHealthcare 589 315 4.47 0
6 Georgia Health Advantage 260 2 5 0
7 Alignment Health Plan 178 45 4.01 0
8 NHC Advantage 178 2 5 0
9 Texas Independence Health Plan 178 2 5 0
10 Longevity Health Plan 46 2 4.56 0

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CMS Part C and D Star Ratings. Values reflect our most recent copy of the source data. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CMS Part C and D Star Ratings. Values reflect our most recent copy of the source data.

Findings

Top entity in the ranking

The top-ranked record in this dataset is Medicare y Mucho Mas (MMM), with a value of 34,334 on the Five-star plans column. The full top-10 set is rendered in the table above. Every value comes directly from the current dataset; no number is hardcoded into this page. When the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes a revision, the ranking and the prose around it update automatically.

Distribution shape

The gap between the top-ranked record (34,334) and the 10th-ranked record (46) characterizes how concentrated the top of the distribution is. Where the top value is many multiples of the median value of the visible set, the population is highly concentrated, a small number of entities accumulate the bulk of the measured quantity. Where the top and bottom of the visible set are close together, the distribution is relatively flat across the top end. The full distribution beyond this top-10 cut is summarized in the aggregate context section below and explored in the linked entity profiles.

Aggregate context

Across the full population behind this ranking, here are the summary statistics: how many records exist in total, the sum of the ranking metric across all qualifying records, and the mean per-record value. The methodology page documents the exact filter applied (records with null or zero values on the ranking metric are excluded). This aggregate row is computed from the same dataset that powers the ranking above.

Source provenance

The records in this ranking originate from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, specifically the CMS Part C and D Star Ratings. PlainMedicare ingests the source vintage published by the agency and republishes it here in a clear, browsable format. Every page reflects our most recent copy of the data, there is no stale cached export, and an update from the source agency propagates to this page within hours. The methodology page documents the source URL, the vintage date, and how each figure is derived.

Why this ranking matters

Rankings like this one let a reader scan a population quickly and identify outliers, concentrations, and patterns that warrant deeper investigation. The detail pages linked from each entity in the table above give the full per-entity context: time-series history where available, related metrics from adjacent tables, and links onward to the underlying source records. The methodology page explains how an entity earns inclusion in the dataset and how the ranking column is computed at the source.

What this analysis cannot tell us

CMS Star Ratings are calculated from a composite of clinical quality measures, member experience scores, complaint rates, and plan administration measures. Not every plan qualifies for a star rating, newer plans without sufficient measurement history are excluded, and the share of an organization's plans that are eligible for rating varies year to year. The five-star count for a given parent organization aggregates plans across all subsidiary contracts; corporate restructuring, acquisitions, and divestitures during the rating period can shift which contracts are attributed to which parent. CMS revises its Star Rating methodology periodically, for example, weighting adjustments between measure categories and changes to the cut-points for assigning stars, and an organization's five-star count can shift between rating years for reasons unrelated to underlying plan quality changes.

Sources